Line: Fe I - λ5028.1

Quality assessable? Yes  |  Robust against analysis method? No

Line considered quality assessable if log(gf)grid and log(gf)cog within error of each other. Line considered robust against analysis method if log(gf)grid and log(gf)cog within 0.04dex of each other.

log(gf)grid: -1.20 ± 0.06      log(gf)cog: -1.15 ± 0.08


Cross-matched literature data

Database λ (Å) log(gf) label low label up Elow (eV) Eup (eV) Jlow Jup
BRASSv1 5028.126 -1.036 LS 3p6.3d7.(2H).4s a1H LS 3p6.3d6.(3H).4s.4p.(3P*) y1G* 3.573 6.038 5.0 4.0
NIST 5028.126 -1.123 3d7.(2H).4sa 1H 3d6.(3H).4s.4p.(3P*)y 1G* 3.573 6.038 5.0 4.0
VALD 5028.126 -1.123 LS 3d7.(2H).4s a1H LS 3d6.(3H).4s.4p.(3P*) y1G* 3.573 6.038 5.0 4.0
SpectroWeb 5028.126 -1.123 - - 3.573 6.038 - -
TIPbase 4969.630 -0.998 4s a1H 4p y1G* 3.772 6.276 5.0 4.0

Line profile plots per G-type benchmark star

Information Radio buttons can be used to choose which database log(gf) values and line profiles to view. Interactive plot controls can be found to the top right of plotting panels.

Top left panel: Points represent the individual stellar log(gf) values plotted as a function of effective temperature. Lines represent the mean log(gf) values and the literature log(gf) values.
Shaded areas represent the uncertainty associated with a given log(gf) value.

Remaining panels: Observed line profiles are shown by black dotted lines for each of the 7 FGK-type benchmark stars. Synthetic line profiles, calculated using the mean log(gf) values and the
literature log(gf) values, are shown by the solid coloured lines. Shaded areas represent the uncertainty in line profile flux due to the uncertainty in the corresponding log(gf) values.


Quality assessment

Warning: log(gf)grid and log(gf)cog are not within 0.04dex of each other. Systematic differences between the log(gf)grid and log(gf)cog values may be caused by additional lines in the synthesis,
which the curve of growth (cog) method does not account for. The quality of these additional lines has not been tested.

Database λ (Å) Δλ(w.r.t GRID) (Å) log(gf) Δlog(gf)(w.r.t GRID) Within error of log(gf)grid?
BRASSv2 GRID 5028.125 ± 0.002 - -1.20 ± 0.06 - -
BRASSv2 COG - - -1.15 ± 0.08 -0.05 Yes
BRASSv1 5028.126 -0.001 -1.04 -0.16 No
NIST 5028.126 -0.001 -1.12 -0.08 No
VALD 5028.126 -0.001 -1.12 -0.08 No
SpectroWeb 5028.126 -0.001 -1.12 -0.08 No
TIPbase 4969.630 58.495 -1.00 -0.20 No

Equivalent widths

WλEpsEri (mÅ) Wλ70 Oph (mÅ) Wλ70 Vir (mÅ) WλSun (mÅ) Wλ51 Peg (mÅ) Wλ10 Tau (mÅ) WλBetCom (mÅ)
Measured 108.45 106.77 89.81 84.28 97.23 78.96 84.46
ΔWλcorr +11.53 +10.51 +4.74 +5.16 +5.94 +1.47 +3.08
Databases
BRASSv2 GRID 130.80 119.63 86.78 86.84 98.91 74.63 82.47
BRASSv2 COG 137.30 125.12 89.91 90.28 102.69 77.32 85.57
BRASSv1 152.26 137.65 96.87 97.94 111.21 83.06 92.41
NIST 140.39 127.70 91.37 91.89 104.47 78.55 87.02
VALD 140.39 127.70 91.37 91.89 104.47 78.55 87.02
SpectroWeb 140.39 127.70 91.37 91.89 104.47 78.55 87.02
TIPbase 157.83 142.32 99.39 100.73 114.33 85.08 94.87